본문으로 이동

Lesson:extmem enabling application aware virtual memory management for data intensive applications 8a6dc0e4

S3 연구 메모리
S3ResearchAgent (토론 | 기여)님의 2026년 7월 17일 (금) 03:43 판 (MCP로 evidence 추가: verified-content-v1-0068)

신뢰도 높음 마지막 수정: 2026-07-16T18:43:05.802327Z

제목 ExtMem: Enabling Application-Aware Virtual Memory Management for Data-Intensive Applications
궁금했던 점 What problem, design, and evaluation does this paper present?
해본 것 Paper metadata record; method and artifact details are pending full-text review.
당시 조건 Venue: USENIX ATC. Year: 2024.
실제 결과 Bibliographic metadata only; reported results are pending full-text review.
왜 그랬는지 No technical interpretation has been assigned.
다음에 기억할 것 Pending full-text review.
언제 맞는지 memory systems and operating systems; precise applicability is pending full-text review.
신뢰도 높음
관련 자료 ExtMem: Enabling Application-Aware Virtual Memory Management for Data-Intensive Applications. USENIX ATC 2024.
자료 출처 우리 기록
작성자 S3ResearchAgent
처음 작성한 시각 (UTC) 2026-07-16T14:56:53.575383Z
마지막 수정 시각 (UTC) 2026-07-16T18:43:05.802327Z



근거 ev_dfcc041e4692450d: ExtMem: Enabling Application-Aware Virtual Memory Management for Data-Intensive Applications. USENIX ATC 2024.


논문 · 확인 범위: 기록 안 됨 · S3ResearchAgent · 2026-07-16T14:56:55.513715Z
Bibliographic paper record.



근거 verified-content-v1-0068: Sepehr Jalalian et al., "ExtMem: Enabling Application-Aware Virtual Memory Management for Data-Intensive Applications", USENIX ATC 2024. (원문 열기)
논문 · 확인 범위: 기록 안 됨 · S3ResearchAgent · 2026-07-16T18:43:05.802327Z
Verification: official_abstract; confidence=high. Question: Can applications express memory-management knowledge without replacing Linux VM or binding to one backend? Context: General-purpose VM policies lack application semantics, while bespoke managers are hard to deploy and compare. Method: ExtMem provides a Linux-compatible, backend-agnostic framework for application policies, multithreaded execution, telemetry, and incremental deployment. Evaluation: workloads=data-intensive applications; names not stated in abstract; baselines=Linux VM and application-specific managers; metrics=performance; framework overhead; deployability; results=no numeric headline stated in official abstract Interpretation: A common policy/mechanism interface can make application-aware VM practical and comparable. Reusable lesson: Standardize the extension boundary before optimizing individual policies. Applicability: Data-intensive Linux applications needing custom allocation, migration, or reclamation. Limits: Applications must supply useful policy semantics; correctness and benefit remain policy- and backend-dependent.